Thursday, October 24, 2019

Robert Frost Essay -- essays research papers

He thought he kept the universe alone,† to most people the thoughts of being alone are very frightening. It is human nature to search for companionship. In the poem â€Å"The Most of It,† Robert Frost uses a wealth of strong imagery to tell a story of a person who has lost his loved one to death and has to suffer the feeling of loneliness and emptiness created by it. Frost uses the setting of a lake surrounded by a forest to convey a feeling of peace and of being alone to the reader. A man is sitting on the edge of the lake, crying out for someone, his echo being his only company. After time, a buck swam across the lake and appeared on the shore and abruptly runs into the brush, away from sight. Although the man only caught a glimpse of the deer for a short moment, it was long enough for him to feel that he was no longer alone, but had something there, even though it was not tangible. The clues given to the reader that someone has passed on are the words â€Å"wakeâ₠¬  and three lines down, the word â€Å"morning.† A wake can be many things; one is that it is a vigil that is held in honor of a person who has recently died. â€Å"Morning† can be taken as â€Å"mourning† and be seen as Frost grieving for a loved one. One also develops the impression that Frost is mourning a great loss, such as a sould mate, because of the line, â€Å"He would cry out on life, that what it wants/ is not its own love back in copy speech/but counter-love.† That quote shows the reader that the man was alone, so alone, that he â€Å"c...

Wednesday, October 23, 2019

Holocaust Post to World War II Essay

Let us begin by quoting the superb words of Elie Wiesel (1995), the Nobel laureate for peace in 1986 and Holocaust survivor: â€Å"For the survivor who chooses to testify, it is clear: his duty is to bear witness for the dead and the living. He has no right to deprive future generations of a past that belongs to our collective memory. To forget would be not only dangerous but offensive; to forget the dead would be akin to killing them a second time. The witness has forced himself to testify. For the youth of today, for the children who will be born tomorrow. He does not want his past to become their future† (cited in Hill and Wang, c2006, pg 15). Cruel Massacre Against Humanity in Holocaust Post to WWII Holocaust post to the beginning of World War II gave an account of tragedy and massive killings of majorly Jews in millions. Other killings involved the people of Gypsies who are descendant of Egypt in history, the mentally and physically challenged ancient individuals, political enemies to the ruling government of Nazi of Germany, and racially undesirable individuals who met an untimely dead end in the Nazi Camp’s of Germany after . This holocaust occurred between the years 1939 and the commencement of World War II. It is a great destruction that is characterized by extensive loss of human lives through means such as fire, nuclear arms et cetera. Holocaust at times is also used to represent the genocide in Armenian and Hellenic. Hellenic are Greece speaking people who suffered massive religious killing of about 3 million Christians in Turkey between the years 1915 to 1925 (Dawidowicz, 1975). Prior to the World War II, over six million Jewish people were targeted and destroyed by the then Nazi government and its co-sponsors. Nazi government of Germany developed a great hatred for the people of Jews who have spread and had established tent all over European States. The destruction was caused by an expression of superiority over the perceived â€Å"inferior Jews†. The spreading and the success of the Jews over some citizen of Europe became a matter of crucial talk among the cabinet members of Nazi. Nazi saw them as strange people who must not live. Later on, Nazi resulted into racial war against the Jews. In addition to the Jews, Nazi also developed similar racial hatred to other set of people in the all over world. The list includes â€Å"the people of Roma called Gypsies, the physically challenged or formally called the handicapped, the Slavic people of Russia, Poland and others as mentioned earlier† (Yahil L. 1990). In addition to the basis of destruction on perception of racial inferiority, political and theological reasons were also confirmed as part of the basis for destruction of certain other set of people. Thirdly is the massive destruction based on ideological group belonging and on cultural hatred for the Jews, one of the prominent groups by then were the Communist, the Socialist groups, and the Jehovah Witness movement. Certain homosexual were not spared in the killing. Due to the presence of certain members of the Nazi government who were homosexuals, there was mixed feelings development towards the extermination this set of people. The Jehovah witness movement group recorded the lowest number of casualties because they were less concentrated in a place unlike others. The achievement was made possible owing to regional concentration of the target people to be destroyed. Some were taken on hostage within a wide range of land for a long period before they were been destroyed by biological weapons, diseases, famine, and other forms of military maltreatment. For the physically challenged group, Nazi carried out his mission by including in his policy the so called â€Å"Euthanasia Program† (early killing to prevent prolong living in serious discomfort and pain). Some able body target among the Jews and Poland were captured and unofficially sentenced to hard labor till they meet their death. Post-World War II Holocaust After the WWII, there was an arrival of a different dimension to the war. Holocaust in the mid-1940 to the early 90s was basically the existence of relative tension, and fragile calmness. This is due to the modernized existence of nuclear and atomic destruction that posed more colossal figures in potential victims. On the basis of nuclear power possession, nations were termed superpower of the world. The era was termed cold war among the two major powerful unions – the United States and the Soviet Union of Eastern Europe, Northern and Central Asian continent. The United State came in following the 1942 Washington Act to deliver the Jews from total extinction. Holocaust Literature In the modern study of holocaust, many theories are used to propose the origin of holocaust. While the Intentionalists accept that holocaust is a deliberate act initiated by Adolf Hitler, the Functionalists argue that the genesis of holocaust was rather a policy failure by the government of Nazi to regulate immigration to Europe and expel other migrants out of Europe. Hence, the Jews find their way in with ease and dominate the Europe in their millions. Functionalists disagree on several claims by the Intentionalism on several of their literature pointing finger on the lack of adequate plan on population growth as the genesis of holocaust. There also exist â€Å"holocaust theology† that reviews God’s kindness and protection shield on His own people.

Tuesday, October 22, 2019

Russias Entry Into the Cold War

Russias Entry Into the Cold War Free Online Research Papers Russia and United States were Allies against the Axis Powers in World War II. It was an unusual relationship due to both countries political beliefs and ideologies. America, which is based on democratic ideals and Russia ruled by an iron fist was enforced by state controlled oppression. It was for the war that and for the elimination of Hitler’s Nazism that the two came together. The Cold War was a result of American’s inability to limit the Soviet Union’s growth in Europe. Franklin Roosevelt’s negotiations with Stalin at Yalta marked the beginning of the dictator’s reign into Eastern Europe. Roosevelt insisted on democratic reforms in Eastern Europe, but he was too soft on Stalin because he needed his help in ending the war. Stalin saw this weakness as a go ahead to take over Poland, Finland , Romania, parts of Yugoslavia, as well as Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia. America’s diplomatic concessions with The Soviet Union was a necessary evil due to the cost of many lives in the war. This relationship even in it’s best form was the ground for future tension as Russia and America clung to their ideologies. Ending the war with nuclear capabilities created a further gap between the U.S. and the Soviets. Out of the destruction of the war, both nations would grow to fear one another. This fear would last for more than 40 y ears and end in 1990 with the collapse of Communism. Russia’s philosophical beliefs were far different than America. America was founded on the romantic conception of democratic republicanism and checks of balances. Russia had a history of Czarism and it’s rule remained at the top. After 1917, with the rise of Lenin’s Communist party, government would remain in the heads of still a few powerful leaders at the top. Stalin would control the Soviet Union during World War II . Before the war, Stalin was noted as a brutal man who felt he was inferior and therefore killed off his political enemies as he did in the Great Purge. His leadership consisted of fear and intimidation for which many suffered. No one was able to rise above Stalin and even more so rise against him. Everything was in the hands of the state and very little individualism existed. To the common man, Russia’s governing powers seemed aloof and distant. It was clear that the government was not for the people. Stalinist communism censored religious thought and was atheistic. Communism censored the arts and instilled in education. Everything was replaced by propaganda for the party and for the whole of the state. Thoughts were controlled and no one dared against the system. Those who thought differently were quickly punished. Everything was given to Joseph Stalin, any trust and hope was given to him and he alone ruled the vast majority of Russia (Lee 81-85). American’s viewed Communism negatively due to the fact that so many American’s were religious and didn’t take well to atheism and it is also very critical that many Americans were so distrustful of complete government control. This type of thinking created an US-VS-THEM mentality and that need to rid the world of THEM. This thinking brought Americans face to face with Korea and Vietnam and even China. One of Stalin’s goals was to change the economy and modernize it. He pushed Russia forward from an agrarian society to the mode of heavy industry. A move that would benefit Russia immensely in World War II because war out put would exceed that of Germany after 1941. In the 1930s Russia collectivized the agricultural system. This created such a disturbance because output was much less and many people starved. The thought was that this would feed the great urban population and industrial base (Lee 61). The Five Year Plan was supposed to move the Soviet Union into age of heavy industry. They focused less on consumer needs to produce steel, coal and such things like armaments. This produced such a large amount of massive factories and cities in which they produced their goods. Many peasents found jobs in the cities where urban areas swelled. Despite growth in heavy industry, such output prepared the Soviets for the Barbarossa invasion in 1941. Many of the factories moved from cities of siege to the Ural Mountains during the invasion. This showed some strength of efficiency, however, most of the materials needed for the war came from the American Lend-Lease Program. It was an indicator that American efficiency in production far outweighed the Russian economy. As the war progressed and conferences were held to determine the strategy of the new order of Europe, the psychological impact of who would win want became increasingly apparent. The testing of nuclear missiles was held in secret by the Americans because of their distrust of the Soviets (Grenville 317-318). This was a shift in the American attitude prior to the post wart period. Even when the U.S. bombed Nagasaki and Hiroshima, Truman pointed out to Stalin at Potsdam the implications of what this type of warfare could do. Truman worried that the Soviets would gain their own plans on nuclear warfare. What one has to keep in mind is the fact that at the end of the war, Russia suffered severe lost. 20-24 million people lost their lives, 25 million people were homeless and many homes and factories were destroyed. After 1945, Russia did not gain any more economic support from the U.S. and Stalin did not anticipate it (Grenville 337). Russian’s diplomatic ties with the West was tied into Stalin’s need to expand his empire. He demanded a western front in west Europe, and in France to relieve military pressure on Europe (Kennan 357). Even though, Churchill delayed this front, FDR assured the public that the front would be in the West. Much of this was appeasement to pacify Stalin so he would not abandon the war. The adoption of a somewhat sympathetic manner was adopted to the Soviet policy of post war growth. Reluctantly, America gave in to so much of Stalin’s demands out of war time emotion and fear of Nazi Aggression (Kennan 359-361). On a deeply personal level, Stalin did not want to lose in this war. Even though he did not want to be in it and up until Hitler invaded his country, he felt it couldn’t happen to him. As soon as he received word of the invasion, He didn’t believe it. After the neutrality pact of 1939, it may have been impossible in his mind. Stalin’s invasion of Finland may have put out mixed signals to Hitler that Russia was feeling very confident and that it needed to be checked. Molotov’s rejection of joining the Axis confirmed this. In a short time, Stalin was calling fellow Soviets to his side for the Great War and in a speech to his countryman on November 7, 1941, canonized past Russian heroes and told Russians to stand up to Hitler. During all this socialist propaganda did not erode but much of Stalin’s attention was diverted to the war and bringing his country together. Church doors were open again for Stalin, who studied for the priesthood, that his own party message would not be enough to bring people together (Tumarkin 63-64). This turned out to be a very emotional and draining point for the Soviet citizens for they gave so much for their home. Many women and children went beyond the front lines to defend their homes and built blockades for their defense. The Siege of Leningrad is an example of such horror. Thousands of people starved and or froze to death. People ate cats and dogs and sometimes each other in rare cases. Food was severely rationed and one needed a card to gain it. This Siege lasted for about 600 days. During this time period, Stalin toughened the Red Army to fight back. His philosophy: â€Å"Not A Step Back† pushed soldiers to their limits for to run away not only made you a coward but brought you death for desertion. This war took quite a toll on Soviet citizens and it is a war that they will never forget (Tumarkin 71-73). Reparations had to be made for this mass destruction. Despite, Russian offensives in to the west and the destruction of Berlin, Naturally Soviets would want a piece of Germany even for their own sake of vengeance. It almost seemed acceptable to make big requests after all that happened to them. This was a good chance to gain sympathy so you could get some just rewards. In discussions of post war reparations, Soviet-Western relations balanced out the need to end the war after the Nazi’s were crushed and to build a Europe free from oppression. To this extent is not quite clear how much the U.S. knew of Stalin’s brutality and the suffering of the Soviets and of the peopled conquered by the Soviets. With Roosevelt’s mention of democratic elements in Eastern Europe, Stalin would only let so much freedom continue. In as much as Russia was wronged in the war, Stalin would use the war to get what he wanted and that was control over as much land as possible so that his e mpire would grow. The Cold War in a sense would have been impossible to avoid by 1943-1945. It’s roots based on totalitarianism and the separation of ideas and beliefs caused it become a reality. The U.S. in it’s isolation joined the war after the Pearl Harbor attacks but beforehand only giving monetary aid to the British and Soviets. Roosevelt moved slowly in joining the war and it was in his reluctance that U.S. built such a great war time economy and that America emerged as the Victor. In viewing the two leaders of Soviet Russia and The U.S., Roosevelt was more idealistic and his mind was different from the destructive nature of Stalin’s philosophies. Roosevelt’s Four Freedoms, Freedom of Want, From of Religion, Freedom of Speech and Freedom Of Fear more or less became large part of the American Psyche. The phrase â€Å" The only thing we have to fear is fear itself† is used over and over again in speeches and is well loved. Roosevelt was loved by his people and he had sympathy for the people who were disconnected and poor .The difference between him and Stalin was that Roosevelt seemed sincere and that Stalin earned his respect through fear. Up until his death, Stalin’s Cult of Personality gave people such mixed reaction and fear. Years later his image was seen as only ruthless. It would this one factor that made many fear Communism and it’s growth. This growth grew out of the tyranny and confusion of Germany and Japan as they invaded the Europe and the Pacific. Possibly the only reason why Russia was never feared during the war was because that country suffered as it did at the hands of Hitler. At that time it was doubtful that outsiders knew how vicious Stalin was. Dealing with Russia’s internal problems was the least of the issues that had to be dealt with at Potsdam and Yalta. In Yalta, Roosevelt was accused of signing Eastern and Central Europe into Russia’s hands. Both he and Churchill did not meet the requests of Poland’s exile government for international control. No other countries were invited to Yalta to represent themselves nor they notified of what was said. Poland, Lithuania, Estonia, and Latvia were declared open for democratic reform but yet these countries remained heavily influenced by Communist powers. Other political parties were murdered or persecuted. Soviets agreed to help the U.S. and in return for Sakhalin and Kurline Islands. Many European nations felt betrayed because they felt that the free and democratic countries did not do what they promised to do. Signed treaties did nothing for these states as they became puppets of the Soviet regime. Going back to 1943, in the Tehran conference, Stalin, Roosevelt and Churchill met for the first time and it was agreed to launch Overlord in June of 1944. Stalin was looking for this support. Russia was asked to participate in the war against Japan. The allies would support the partisans in Yugoslavia. The Three Powers would keep in touch with each other to discuss post war and war issues. Nothing is said about Stalin’s reputation during these meetings and it appears that only thing that appears credible is the fact that Russia is a superpower thanks to strength of the Red Army. At Potsdam, where Germany was divided into four zones and Japan given the ultimatem to surrender that new elected President Truman and Churchill suspect Stalin has ulterior motives. The Atomic bomb is introduced and agreed upon to end the war and Stalin who already has spies discovering this, gives Truman the pat on the back to use it. It is ironic how these men shared so many ideas at these conferences and worked together to end the war became the same ones who started so much fear and distrust. Despite their ideological differences and their aims, they ended two camps of terrorism and in the end, Soviet Russia was just as vicious and tyrannical as the Japanese and the Nazi’s. The U.S. would hunt down and suspect anyone who didn’t support the American way as a trader or a Communist. It is easy to look at the events and ideas that shaped the Cold War and rely on any fact that represents the truth. There are too many issues to think about and dissect. As stated earlier, the differences in the way the U.S. and Russia approached terrorism and what their aims were after the war explain a lot about how the Cold War ensued. Diplomacy is so complex and important for a state. It is important that a foreign diplomat not be outguessed by the other party. As it was for Stalin and his ambitions, the war opened a door for him. His earlier diplomatic ties with Germany gave him the eastern sector of Poland and when Hitler turned the tables on him, it gave him an excuse to move west and take over parts of Europe. Both Russia and America would meet to gain control over Europe but Stalin would figure out the weaknesses of the U.S. and of Britain and use to his advantage. The framework of foreign diplomacy is such that diplomats try to appease each other for a common cause. It is e vident here that the Soviet Union was needed and that the U.S. would support it for those means. The Iron Curtain was created in 1946. In a speech made by Winston Churchill in Missouri, with Truman by his side, Churchill announced that the Iron Curtain divided the continent and that only strong Anglo-American allies can tear it down. God has willed the Americans the Atomic Bomb. This statement divided the U.S. and the Soviets indefinitely. George Kennan, expert in Russian affairs stated that the Soviets ready to attack and destroy the U.S. was largely a creation of the Western imagination. The Soviet Union became an enemy of the American people and it would be the Truman Doctrine that would aid Greece and Turkey and those who are fighting against dictatorships that subjugate them. This is indicative of the Mythical realities of war where there is a Us versus Them mentality and that the enemy lies and that WE tell the truth. They act on a will of power and we on self defense since we are moral and righteous. The enemies will must be broken and WE must use force. The same theory u sed on the Nazi’s and Japanese now focused on the Russians bent to teach them a lesson. Research Papers on Russia's Entry Into the Cold WarAppeasement Policy Towards the Outbreak of World War 2Assess the importance of Nationalism 1815-1850 EuropeQuebec and CanadaThe Effects of Illegal ImmigrationBringing Democracy to AfricaTwilight of the UAW19 Century Society: A Deeply Divided EraComparison: Letter from Birmingham and CritoPETSTEL analysis of IndiaCapital Punishment

Monday, October 21, 2019

Postal Service Wants to Offer Payday Loans

Postal Service Wants to Offer Payday Loans Even though it loses massive quantities of it every year, the U.S. Postal Service (USPS) wants to loan you money. Short-term â€Å"payday† loans are just one of the financial services the USPS has proposed offering though Post Offices in order to serve the scores of American â€Å"unbanked† individuals and families, while protecting them from predatory payday lenders and, of course, bettering its own dismal financial status. According to a report from the USPS’ inspector general, one in four U.S. households lives at least partially outside the financial mainstream without bank accounts or using costly services like payday lenders – and spends an average of $2,412 each year just on interest and fees for such alternative financial services. â€Å"Many of the 34 million financially underserved households - representing 68 million adults - are treading water very close to the economic edge,† wrote the inspector general. â€Å"Unexpected expenses can push them over the brink into homelessness or bankruptcy, which come with broad social and economic costs.† The inspector general estimates the USPS could bring in almost $9 billion a year by capturing just 10% of the $89 billion spent on alternative financial services in the U.S. every year. â€Å"Postal financial services may appeal to many customers who feel abandoned by major financial institutions,† states the report. â€Å"Postal organizations have an unmatched ability to reach consumers from diverse backgrounds.† As the report notes, many international postal services are already garnering significant new revenue by offering financial services. Of course, the USPS also hopes to make money by charging interest on these short-term loans, but at a far lower rate than those charged by traditional payday lenders. USPS Brand Payday Loan vs. Traditional Payday Loans The USPS inspector general suggests the Postal Service could offer short-term – payday – loans with interest rates of 28%, compared to the average interest rate of 391% charged by traditional payday lenders. For example, a person borrowing $375 from a traditional payday lender would end up having to pay back a total of about $896, including $521 in interest and fees. The same $375 borrowed from the USPS would end up costing only $423, including $48 in interest and fees. â€Å"That single loan from the Postal Service could effectively put $472 back into a consumer’s pocket, which he or she could then use on more economically productive expenses,† stated the report. â€Å"If even one-tenth of the 12 million Americans who take out a payday loan each year got this hypothetical Postal Loan instead, they could collectively save more than half a billion dollars a year in fees and interest.† In addition, says the inspector general, short-term Postal Service loans would allow the estimated 10 million unbanked U.S. households which cannot afford high-interest rate payday loans to borrow the money they need. â€Å"There is a wide range of consumers who need access to small-dollar credit, and the Postal Loan could strongly appeal to these different types of borrowers,† noted the inspector general. â€Å"For example, people whose income varies throughout the year, consumers with no other avenues to credit, families with unexpected expenses, and others.† Finally, contends the report, affordable Postal Service loans would help people break the â€Å"cycle of debt,† that forces them to borrow more money to make payments on existing loans. According to a 2104 report from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, more than 80% of payday loans are either extended or followed by another loan less than two weeks later. While the â€Å"average† interest rate for traditional payday loans may be 391%, the Consumer Federation of America (CFA) has warned consumers of online payday lenders charging interest rates of 650% USPS Vows Not to Compete with Banks If you own a bank, don’t worry. The inspector general makes it perfectly clear that the USPS has no intention of becoming a bank or even competing with banks. Instead, says his report, in offering small short-term loans and other financial services, the Postal Service would â€Å"greatly complement† the services offered by banks. Correctly noting that banks are closing branches in inner city low-income and rural areas nationwide, the inspector general says the USPS would help banks â€Å"fill the gaps in their efforts to reach the underserved.† And remember, â€Å"The Postal Service also is among the most trusted companies in America, and trust is a critical element for implementing financial services,† he added. Also See: Postal Services Wants to Deliver Groceries

Sunday, October 20, 2019

Free Essays on Harper

In the 1850’s, the matter of slavery was beginning to separate the United States, forcing people to side with either the North, which was for the elimination of slavery, or with the South, which had far more need of slaves. In the North, abolitionist groups were becoming more and more adamant that the slaves be set free immediately without compensation to their owners, while the Southerners were growing increasingly resolute that no one would force them to release them before they were ready and willing to do so. Five years prior to the raid of Harper’s Ferry, the 1854 Kansas-Nebraska Act passed by Congress broadened the gap between the two opposing sides. In 1854, Kansas and Nebraska were still territories of the United States that had been obtained from France in the 1803 Louisiana Purchase. This statute declared that the settlers of these regions could determine for themselves whether or not to allow slavery. The passage of this piece of legislation ignored the Missouri Compromise of 1820, which had allowed the practice of slavery in Missouri and any new territories south of the 36Â ° 30’ latitude line. Both Kansas and Nebraska were above that line, and clearly should have been automatically declared free regions. Opponents of slavery were furious at this blatant disregard of the Missouri Compromise, which had been such an important law because both the North and South feared that the other would become more powerful through the addition of new territories adhering to their especial stance on slavery. For the past thirty-four years, this act had prevented slavery from spreading into the North, and once the law had been passed over due to the efforts of Southern legislators, what was to stop it from taking over the nation? Enraged abolitionists made the decision to converge their efforts on Kansas in an attempt to save it from becoming part of the slave-state group. Their violent undertaking, and the fight of the Sout... Free Essays on Harper Free Essays on Harper In the 1850’s, the matter of slavery was beginning to separate the United States, forcing people to side with either the North, which was for the elimination of slavery, or with the South, which had far more need of slaves. In the North, abolitionist groups were becoming more and more adamant that the slaves be set free immediately without compensation to their owners, while the Southerners were growing increasingly resolute that no one would force them to release them before they were ready and willing to do so. Five years prior to the raid of Harper’s Ferry, the 1854 Kansas-Nebraska Act passed by Congress broadened the gap between the two opposing sides. In 1854, Kansas and Nebraska were still territories of the United States that had been obtained from France in the 1803 Louisiana Purchase. This statute declared that the settlers of these regions could determine for themselves whether or not to allow slavery. The passage of this piece of legislation ignored the Missouri Compromise of 1820, which had allowed the practice of slavery in Missouri and any new territories south of the 36Â ° 30’ latitude line. Both Kansas and Nebraska were above that line, and clearly should have been automatically declared free regions. Opponents of slavery were furious at this blatant disregard of the Missouri Compromise, which had been such an important law because both the North and South feared that the other would become more powerful through the addition of new territories adhering to their especial stance on slavery. For the past thirty-four years, this act had prevented slavery from spreading into the North, and once the law had been passed over due to the efforts of Southern legislators, what was to stop it from taking over the nation? Enraged abolitionists made the decision to converge their efforts on Kansas in an attempt to save it from becoming part of the slave-state group. Their violent undertaking, and the fight of the Sout... Free Essays on Harper In the 1850’s, the matter of slavery was beginning to separate the United States, forcing people to side with either the North, which was for the elimination of slavery, or with the South, which had far more need of slaves. In the North, abolitionist groups were becoming more and more adamant that the slaves be set free immediately without compensation to their owners, while the Southerners were growing increasingly resolute that no one would force them to release them before they were ready and willing to do so. Five years prior to the raid of Harper’s Ferry, the 1854 Kansas-Nebraska Act passed by Congress broadened the gap between the two opposing sides. In 1854, Kansas and Nebraska were still territories of the United States that had been obtained from France in the 1803 Louisiana Purchase. This statute declared that the settlers of these regions could determine for themselves whether or not to allow slavery. The passage of this piece of legislation ignored the Missouri Compromise of 1820, which had allowed the practice of slavery in Missouri and any new territories south of the 36Â ° 30’ latitude line. Both Kansas and Nebraska were above that line, and clearly should have been automatically declared free regions. Opponents of slavery were furious at this blatant disregard of the Missouri Compromise, which had been such an important law because both the North and South feared that the other would become more powerful through the addition of new territories adhering to their especial stance on slavery. For the past thirty-four years, this act had prevented slavery from spreading into the North, and once the law had been passed over due to the efforts of Southern legislators, what was to stop it from taking over the nation? Enraged abolitionists made the decision to converge their efforts on Kansas in an attempt to save it from becoming part of the slave-state group. Their violent undertaking, and the fight of the Sout...

Saturday, October 19, 2019

Media Management Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Media Management - Essay Example This essay stresses that rdio and television managers must share the same basic principles of responsible journalism as the people they hire in running their newsrooms. Regardless of how enthusiastic, well trained and forward thinking journalists may be, public affairs and news programming stand little chance of growth unless the motivation and expertise of airing something, with the exception of music, is nurtured at the management level. This paper makes a conclusion that inexperienced station managers may view maintenance of news as capital intensive and very risky politically and decide not to venture into it. Such managers must familiarize themselves with the numerous examples from other media houses in recent years where the risks have paid off well in terms of loyal audiences, favorable public perception and increased revenue. Managers should evaluate the skills of their newsroom in order to understand the qualities of good news and public affairs programs and also how to maximize advertisement sales due to the effect of local news programming. Media managers must also familiarize themselves with the basics of journalistic ethics because it is them who will the final arbiters and not journalists whenever there are accusations, disputes or ethical calls to be addressed. Media house management should acquaint themselves with key functions of media management such as ethics and law in broadcasting, technology and e ngineering, station promotion and identification and production and creativity. Others include sales principles, advertising and pricing, structure of a radio or TV station, and broadcast programming. Hierarchy of organizational communications needs Just like Maslow's hierarchy of human needs, there is also a hierarchy of organizational communications. The basic level of communication is the customer service that involves being available to execute communications on a responsive and professional basis, but not ordering anything more. This involves the media personnel just doing their job and has been compared to Maslow's physiological needs for food, shelter and water. From customer service, the level of communication goes up to 'media' where an appropriate range of media resources where the work is well produced and receives a high audience rating. This is a very secure and safe way of meeting the needs of the customers but does not add anything more. It is very much like Maslow's human safety need. Achieving the third level of communication requires a little more effort since media development becomes more goal-oriented because it defines the audience and the message and sets priorities to reach its communication objectives. This is the stage where communications becomes more proactive and the level of the work must be scaled down to the level of the

Friday, October 18, 2019

Healthcare Industry Overview Grid Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Healthcare Industry Overview Grid - Essay Example If it looks as if there is a market big enough to make a profitable product, the product is unique in the market and the product can be protected (via patenting or some other means) then businesses are commonly encouraged to dive into the expensive product development phase. Pharmaceutical/ Drug Industry is mainly responsible for developing, producing and marketing drugs that have been approved by the health authorities or governing agencies McGuire et.al, 2007) These drugs are mainly intended for medicinal purposes. Pharmaceutical companies can sell generic or branded medications. However, distribution and selling of such medicines are subject to variety of laws since there are issues regarding patenting, testing and marketing of drugs. The government is very strict in monitoring the pharmaceutical industry since the health of the general public is at stake. Health care personnel can be employed by pharmaceutical companies as medical technologists, chemists, or researchers. Usually, medical and sales representatives are also needed by this industry. Biotechnology researchers are in demand in this industry as well as laboratory assistants. Health Information Systems falls under the category of Health Informatics. It is a multi-disciplinary approach wherein computer science is integrated in health care services. A good health information system integrates â€Å"administrative files, enrollment files, clinical information, surveys and other data† (McGlynn,1998). Companies that offer Health Information Systems provide software services as well as database systems that can help health professionals make accurate decisions about patients. Some of the services provided by HIS are Health Information Management, dictation and transcription, document management and imaging, case management, revenue cycle management, and performance improvement. Health Information Systems